Troll
11th Nov 2007, 12:52 PM
Okay, even I question the validity of this as a debate to a degree, but something got me wondering about something and here I am.
Is there really a homosexual subtext to Stargate Atlantis? I missed this weeks episode so I went to IMDB to get the episode name and number so I could download it and I noticed this was under the show's content
TV Series:"Stargate: Atlantis" (2004)
Original Air Date:9 November 2007 (Season 4, Episode 7)
Genre:Action / Drama / Sci-Fi / Adventure more
Plot Synopsis:This plot synopsis is empty. Add a synopsis
Plot Keywords:Homosexual Subtext / Good Versus Evil / Made For Cable TV / Alien / Atlantis more
Has anyone noticed an ongoing theme of homosexuality between any of the characters? Am I so damned enlightened that there is and I just ain't noticed it? Or is my damn gaydar broke? :doh
But for the purpose of the spirit of debate, are there things being attached to things such as movies, music and tv shows by collectives or groups of people in order to ease others into acceptance? I mean we can say the democrats are the most pro-environmental people because they contain the "save the world hippies" (not really my choice of words but something a guy I know has said in the past) and more heavy recyclers and those who push for things more "loudly", but there is also the fact that the republicans are heavy on saving the environment as they are the more predominent hunters and fishers and know of the need for clean woodlands and waterways for their activities and many are involved in saving the wetlands and forest lands through buying up the lands. Yet when we speak of the environment, we think more towards liberals or democrats.
So , as previously asked, are certain groups assigned the larger responsibility of caring about an issue than they actually deserve or warrant? Or are some groups just trying different tactics to make the opposition feel more relaxed about an issue because they attach something to things that others can relate to?
And this should be a peaceful debate. The worst this should bring about is an argument over who has a claim on what cause, when it is my opinion that people in general have a claim on all causes.
Is there really a homosexual subtext to Stargate Atlantis? I missed this weeks episode so I went to IMDB to get the episode name and number so I could download it and I noticed this was under the show's content
TV Series:"Stargate: Atlantis" (2004)
Original Air Date:9 November 2007 (Season 4, Episode 7)
Genre:Action / Drama / Sci-Fi / Adventure more
Plot Synopsis:This plot synopsis is empty. Add a synopsis
Plot Keywords:Homosexual Subtext / Good Versus Evil / Made For Cable TV / Alien / Atlantis more
Has anyone noticed an ongoing theme of homosexuality between any of the characters? Am I so damned enlightened that there is and I just ain't noticed it? Or is my damn gaydar broke? :doh
But for the purpose of the spirit of debate, are there things being attached to things such as movies, music and tv shows by collectives or groups of people in order to ease others into acceptance? I mean we can say the democrats are the most pro-environmental people because they contain the "save the world hippies" (not really my choice of words but something a guy I know has said in the past) and more heavy recyclers and those who push for things more "loudly", but there is also the fact that the republicans are heavy on saving the environment as they are the more predominent hunters and fishers and know of the need for clean woodlands and waterways for their activities and many are involved in saving the wetlands and forest lands through buying up the lands. Yet when we speak of the environment, we think more towards liberals or democrats.
So , as previously asked, are certain groups assigned the larger responsibility of caring about an issue than they actually deserve or warrant? Or are some groups just trying different tactics to make the opposition feel more relaxed about an issue because they attach something to things that others can relate to?
And this should be a peaceful debate. The worst this should bring about is an argument over who has a claim on what cause, when it is my opinion that people in general have a claim on all causes.