PDA

View Full Version : 60K House - to furnish or not to furnish


maxon
16th May 2011, 02:59 PM
Back in 2006, the then Deputy Prime Minister of the UK (John Prescott) initiated a scheme in London to stimulate the building of good cheap housing. This was because house prices in London were sky-high and essential workers were finding it difficult to live there. The idea was to build interesting, liveable houses, not depressing box-hutches. A number of architects had a go at designing such houses - the name, 60K, encapsulates what they were supposed to aim for. That is, that each house should cost no more than £60,000 to buy - a reasonable and affordable house price in London. In other words, these are what we simmers would call STARTER HOMES.

I liked the project and had a go at building a house based on some of the designs. This is the house I used as the starting point for the exterior and the house I built in imitation of it.

The lot is a shrunk one using Mootilda's lot expander tool and is 40 x 10 - the idea being that you can line them up next to each other and make a street. They're built up to one square away from the edge and so are 8 tiles wide. I decided to leave space enough at the front to allow placement of a driveway piece (though you'll need to use moveobjects on to place it).

I'm fairly pleased with the build itself - the interior is based on the attached ground plan though it has been adapted making the bedroom in the back smaller and adding a study/3rd bedroom. Any comments on the build are welcome but what I really want to ask is what people think about decorating the house? I am not particularly interested in decorating the house myself. I enjoy the building aspect of lot building but find the decorating and furnishing fairly boring. I've tried to decorate the house but I have to say this is not fun for me. Whenever I download a lot for myself, I either DL the empty version of it or strip out everything once I have it loaded in the game. I prefer to start families on a lot with a pre-built house but with no fixtures and fittings. However, I am aware that that isn't necessarily what people would like to download. Would you be willing to comment on this? What do you prefer? A pre-decorated house or an empty one?

One thing that I should say is that unfurnished, this is genuinely a starter house coming in at just about $16,000 but as soon as you start decorating, the price shoots up to well over $20,000. I have tried a decorated version using some of the modern furniture (including a lot of the 'cheap' IKEA stuff) and the price is now $57,794 (I'll post some pics following). Using the cheap stuff in a house like this looks wrong so it's practically impossible to keep this as a starter home if I decorate it. For myself, I would likely start a couple off in this house and gradually decorate as they earned enough money to afford suitable stuff (I'm very strict).

ShineShine
16th May 2011, 04:02 PM
I would like to see it from the side, your house :)
When I download a house I download it mostly because it looks so absolutely realistic, like a real house, and when I'm just impressed by the way it's build. Well, okay that's more for cluttering my neighborhood. When I then play the house I -always- change something: floors, walls, etc. And the furniture, too. My gameplay is also very strict. But in my opinion that's how the game makes fun: having less money and try to improve and improve.
So furniture isn't that important for me. I go for the outward appearance. Stick to that what makes fun :) Most important thing!

Lance
16th May 2011, 04:42 PM
Why don't upload both furnished and unfurnished versions?

maxon
16th May 2011, 07:31 PM
Why don't upload both furnished and unfurnished versions?

I was thinking that - the problem is, I don't think I'm very inspired when it comes to decorating. Here are some pictures - these are ground floor.

maxon
16th May 2011, 07:33 PM
And these are first floor:



Shine Shine - I'll post a side picture later. The one I took didn't come out right so I'll have to try again. Thank you both for your responses.

ShineShine
16th May 2011, 11:37 PM
Oh, I love your furnishing!! Don't want to miss it. It looks all so authentic.

maxon
18th May 2011, 11:23 AM
This is the side view as promised. Any further comments welcome.

cocoacup
19th May 2011, 09:02 PM
This looks really good, especially the windows.
This kinda house would also make great apartments, like two or three in a row to rent out. I would say leave unfurnished, although its my personal preference that I like to furnish my own homes as it depends on the type of family I move in there.
Good work! :lovestruc

maxon
19th May 2011, 11:16 PM
This looks really good, especially the windows.
This kinda house would also make great apartments, like two or three in a row to rent out. I would say leave unfurnished, although its my personal preference that I like to furnish my own homes as it depends on the type of family I move in there.
Good work! :lovestruc

Hmmm - you know that's not a bad idea. I could try to recreate the ambiance of that first picture where the house has been built next to a park. :up:

Phaenoh
20th May 2011, 10:21 PM
From your floor plan, it seems like the width of the house would be 5 tiles and the depth 10. Taking out those extra three tiles of width and depth might help keep your cost down as well as improving the look of the outside.

maxon
21st May 2011, 12:06 PM
Yes, the original build (on a not-narrow lot) was thinner. It was expanded in this version so that you could place the lots side-by-side and make a street of houses close together. Narrowing it by three spaces would be too much and you'd lose the streetiness. At this size (above), the house is nice to move around during play and there's plenty of room to place stuff. It could stand to lose a little width (as it was originally) but not three spaces. I don't think it would work gameplay-wise. The other thing is that I was not aiming to recreate the house pictured so I didn't really bother with following the plan with any strict method of measurement in mind (there were about 20 entries for the competition and that floorplan doesn't belong to that exterior anyway). The point of the build was to use the idea of the 60k house and the architect's plans as a starting point. Furnishing pushes the price up a lot quicker than adding a few walls - I don't think it would be possible to furnish this appropriately (i.e. with modern furniture) and keep the price down. I was thinking of making an apartment version of the house (as suggested above) and thought with that I could revert to the thinner version of the house which would look closer to the spirit of the original starting point which would be good, I think.